No Contact = No Contact

No Contact = No Contact

A big surprise from the courts today؟ The courts have determined that no contact means no contact - no matter who initiates the contact.

A11-1795        State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Aaron Bobby Phipps, Appellant.

Stearns County District Court, Hon. Judge Mary B. Mahler.

When determining whether an order for protection is unconstitutionally vague, a court should apply the void-for-vagueness doctrine that applies to the determination whether a statute is unconstitutionally vague.

An order for protection providing that there must be "no contact" between the petitioner and the respondent is not unconstitutionally vague.  Such an order prohibits the respondent from engaging in contact with the petitioner even if the petitioner first contacts the respondent.

Affirmed.  Chief Judge Matthew E. Johnson.

By: Landon J. Ascheman, Esq.
(B) 612.217.0077 (C) 651.280.9533

2 comments (Add your own)

1. Privet wrote:

Thu, April 18, 2019 @ 7:54 AM

2. Krystyna Mueller wrote:

Do you need a cloud accounting app that makes maintaining your small business very easy, fast and secure? Automatize tasks such as invoicing, organizing expenditures, keeping track of your time and energy and in addition following up with prospects in just a few clicks?

Consult the clip : and try it for yourself absolutely free for 30 days.



In no way thinking of cloud accounting? We wont get in touch with you once again :

Submit as unsolicited mail :

Thu, July 25, 2019 @ 3:18 AM

Add a New Comment


Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.